Search for difficult conversations training for managers and what comes back is courses. A day in a classroom, an afternoon online, a module to work through at your desk. Each one explains the conversation. The manager gets a structure to follow, some phrases to open with and a list of things not to do. Plenty of them are good, and most managers come back knowing more than they did.
Six months later the conversation they were sent on the course to have still has not happened. The manager can describe how it should go. They have not had it. If you booked the course that is a frustrating thing to watch, and the reason it happens is the reason the Management Lab is built around rehearsal rather than explanation.
What difficult conversations training does well
I want to be fair to the course first, because a good one gives a manager things they need.
It gives them a shape. Open with what you noticed, say what it did, ask for their view, agree what changes next. A manager who walks in holding a structure is less likely to wander off into something else.
It gives them words. A lot of avoidance comes from not knowing how to start, and a handful of opening lines takes that excuse away.
It names the traps, too: the apology that undoes the point, the list of six things when one would have landed, raising it in the corridor because the meeting room felt too formal. A manager who has heard these named will recognise a few in themselves.
Being sent on the course also tells the manager that the organisation expects the conversation to happen, and for some people that was what they were waiting for. I would not tell you to skip any of this.
What a course cannot do
A course cannot give the manager a go at it. Everything on the course happens before the conversation. The structure, the phrases, the traps, all of it is preparation, and the next time any of it gets used is with the real person, about the real thing, on the day it matters.
The difficulty starts with the reply. The manager gets through the opening line they were given, and the other person says "that's not fair", or "why are you only raising this now", or says nothing at all. The structure carried the manager as far as the point where the other person responds, and no slide covers the next line, because the next line depends on what was just said. The manager can describe how the conversation should go, but they have never been in the moment where the other person answers back.
“The manager can describe how the conversation should go, but they have never been in the moment where the other person answers back.”
A manager who has been in that moment once, in a room where it did not matter, goes into the real thing knowing they got through it before. A manager who has never been in it has the slides, and the slides stop at the reply.
Why the gap looks like avoidance
From the outside you see a manager who keeps not having the conversation. It looks like a confidence problem, and the tempting conclusion is that they need another course, or a firmer word from you.
I read it differently. Most people put off things they have never done and cannot afford to get wrong, which is a sensible way to behave. The manager is weighing the cost of the conversation going badly, with a real colleague, in front of a real team, against the cost of waiting another week, and waiting wins every time. Another course does not change that, because the thing making the conversation expensive is that it has never been tried. What changes it is a version of the conversation where getting it wrong costs a minute and a second go.
What rehearsal does that a course cannot
In the Lab, two managers play a scene built from a situation the group recognises, and the rest of the room watches. Nobody plays themselves or a real named colleague. Everyone is a character in a situation, and that distance is what lets people try something new.
I stop the scene at the first point it starts to go wrong and we look at what the last line did to the conversation. The feedback is about the line, not the person who said it. The same pair then picks it up from that point and tries something different.
After that they swap sides. The manager who was delivering the news is now receiving it, and hears their own words from across the table. Most feedback about how you come across has to be taken on trust. This does not, because you were sitting there when it happened.
By the time the manager has the real conversation, the moment where the other person pushes back is one they have already been in, and got through, with people watching.
What to book, and in which order
If your managers have never been on a difficult conversations course, a course is a reasonable place to start. The structure and the vocabulary are worth having. If they have been on one and the conversations are still not happening, another course gives them more of what they already have.
Ask them a different question instead. Where have they said it out loud to somebody who pushed back? If the answer is nowhere, that is what to buy. The Lab is three hours, up to sixteen managers, at your office, and it starts at £750 on the rate card.
Applied Improv Scotland
Communication training for teams across the Central Belt. Sessions from £400, refunded in full if they don't land.
See the sessionsMore from Insights.
The conversation your first-line managers are avoiding
They know what to say. They've just never said it out loud.
How to talk to an underperforming employee who doesn't see it
The hardest version of this conversation is with someone who thinks they are doing fine. Here it is, played one line at a time.
Get a price and a date.
Tell me the group size and roughly when. You'll have a written quote back within one working day, and the fee is refunded in full if the session doesn't land.
Ask for a price